# Randol v. Newberg Public School Board

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · November 24, 1975 · 23 Or. App. 425

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9542593

## Case

- **Full name:** RANDOL, Appellant, v. NEWBERG PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARD, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** November 24, 1975
- **Citations:** 23 Or. App. 425; 542 P.2d 938; 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 1002
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Thornton
- **Judges:** Schwab, Langtry, Thornton
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9542593

## Opinion text

THORNTON, J.,
specially concurring.
I agree with the majority that the defendant school board had the legal authority to adopt the challenged no smoking regulation and to suspend petitioner for violating it.
The majority seems to base its conclusion on the *428 rationale of Neuhaus v. Federico, 12 Or App 314 , 505 P2d 939 , Sup Ct review denied (1973), which I believe to have been incorrectly decided.
Accordingly, I wish to be recorded as concurring here for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion in Neuhaus .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9542593. Public record. Not legal advice.
