# Schrock v. Albert Einstein Medical Center

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · August 2, 1989 · 386 Pa. Super. 215

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9540933

## Case

- **Full name:** Joseph R. SCHROCK v. ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER, DAROFF DIVISION and Joseph L. Chapman, M.D. Appeal of ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER, DAROFF DIVISION, Appellant
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** August 2, 1989
- **Citations:** 386 Pa. Super. 215; 562 A.2d 875; 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2306
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Cavanaugh
- **Judges:** Cirillo, Cavanaugh, Brosky, Rowley, McEwen, Olszewski, Montemuro, Popovich, Johnson
- **Cited by:** 18 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9540933

## Opinion text

*221 CAVANAUGH, Judge,
dissenting.
I dissent and would remand for a calculation of delay damages under New Rule 238 for the reasons set forth in my Dissenting Opinion in King v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 383 Pa.Super. 420 , 557 A.2d 11 (1989.)
OLSZEWSKI, J., joins CAVANAUGH, J.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9540933. Public record. Not legal advice.