# Hassett v. State

> Idaho Court of Appeals · July 25, 1995 · 127 Idaho 313

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9540780

## Case

- **Full name:** Steven L. HASSETT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of Idaho, Respondent
- **Court:** Idaho Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** July 25, 1995
- **Citations:** 127 Idaho 313; 900 P.2d 221; 1995 Ida. App. LEXIS 92
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Carey
- **Judges:** Walters, Carey
- **Cited by:** 205 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9540780

## Opinion text

CAREY, Judge Pro Tem.,
specially concurring.
I concur in the analysis and the result, which also are supported by the recent case of McDonald v. State, 124 Idaho 103 , 856 P.2d 893 (Ct.App.1992). In McDonald the Court of Appeals intimated that a post-conviction hearing may be unnecessary if the trial judge determines that his or her discretionary decision will not change even if the allegations in the application for post-conviction relief are true and even if the application shows that the original proceedings may have been tainted by legal or factual error.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9540780. Public record. Not legal advice.