# Hoard v. Wiley

> Court of Appeals of Georgia · March 17, 1966 · 113 Ga. App. 328

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9540446

## Case

- **Full name:** HOARD Et Al. v. WILEY
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Georgia
- **Decided:** March 17, 1966
- **Citations:** 113 Ga. App. 328; 147 S.E.2d 782; 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 1057
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Pannell
- **Judges:** Jordan, Hall, Eberhardt, Deen, Felton, Nichols, Frankum, Pannell, Bell
- **Cited by:** 104 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9540446

## Opinion text

Pannell, Judge,
concurring specially. I concur in the judgment of reversal for the sole reason that the only testimony as to value (that of the plaintiff himself) did not demand, or authorize, the verdict directed, and this is true regardless of the cases discussed and of the various rules sponsored by the various opinions. The testimony of the plaintiff as to value was contradictory and equivocal, and construed most strongly against him did not authorize the verdict directed. It, therefore, is un *336 necessary to affirm or overrule any of the previous decisions of this court discussed and referred to in the opinion and relating to the probative value and. legal effect of opinion evidence, and I expressly dissent, for this reason, to the overruling of any of these decisions.
I am authorized to say that Felton, C. J., Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., join me in this special concurrence.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9540446. Public record. Not legal advice.