# Acosta v. County of Los Angeles

> California Supreme Court · July 3, 1961 · 56 Cal. 2d 208

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9539412

## Case

- **Full name:** THOMAS ACOSTA, a Minor, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** July 3, 1961
- **Citations:** 56 Cal. 2d 208; 14 Cal. Rptr. 433; 363 P.2d 473; 88 A.L.R. 2d 1417; 1961 Cal. LEXIS 283
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by McCOMB
- **Judges:** White, McComb
- **Cited by:** 15 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9539412

## Opinion text

McCOMB, J.
I dissent. I would affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed by Mr. Presiding Justice Shinn in the opinion prepared by him for the District Court of Appeal, Acosta v. County of Los Angeles, (Cal.App.) 10 Cal. Rptr. 222 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9539412. Public record. Not legal advice.