# City of Tulsa v. Nicholas

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · June 21, 1966 · 415 P.2d 917

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9538689

## Case

- **Full name:** CITY OF TULSA, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Hugh B. NICHOLAS and Nevola Nicholas, Husband and Wife, F. L. Richards, and Clinton McGill, Defendants in Error
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** June 21, 1966
- **Citations:** 415 P.2d 917; 1966 OK 117
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Halley
- **Judges:** Blackbird, Jackson, Davison, Williams, Irwin, Berry, Hodges, Lavender, Halley
- **Cited by:** 11 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9538689

## Opinion text

*924 HALLEY, Chief Justice
(dissenting).
I am forced to dissent in this case for the reason that I think that the rezoning of the area under consideration is unwarranted here. It will make commercial an area that is residential, and force property owners to put up with conditions that make living therein unbearable.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9538689. Public record. Not legal advice.