# Fraser v. Clark

> Montana Supreme Court · July 8, 1954 · 128 Mont. 160

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9538656

## Case

- **Full name:** FRASER, Et Al., Appellants, v. CLARK, Et Al., Respondents
- **Court:** Montana Supreme Court
- **Decided:** July 8, 1954
- **Citations:** 128 Mont. 160; 273 P.2d 105; 1954 Mont. LEXIS 47
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Anderson
- **Judges:** Adair, Angstman, Anderson, Bottomly, Freebourn
- **Cited by:** 33 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9538656

## Opinion text

MR. JUSTICE ANDERSON:
(dissenting).
I agree generally with what has been said by Mr. Justice Angstman but wish to make the further comment.
Since the opinion by this court in Hardenburgh v. Harden-burgh, 115 Mont. 469 , 146 Pac. (2d) 151 , the questions regarding venue have caused the practicing lawyer and the students of the subject considerable concern. See Montana Law Review, Vol. X, 1949, p. 83 et seq.
Nothing said in the majority opinion tends to reduce the confusion that exists on the subject. It merely disposes of the present controversy and in my judgment lends no help to the lawyer who may find himself confronted with questions of venue in the future.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9538656. Public record. Not legal advice.