# Roy v. City of Everett

> Washington Supreme Court · February 6, 1992 · 118 Wash. 2d 352

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9538583

## Case

- **Full name:** Sheila Roy, Individually and as Guardian, Respondent, v. the City of Everett, Et Al, Petitioners
- **Court:** Washington Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 6, 1992
- **Citations:** 118 Wash. 2d 352; 823 P.2d 1084; 1992 Wash. LEXIS 40
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Andersen
- **Judges:** Dolliver, Andersen, Dore
- **Cited by:** 24 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9538583

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that Snohomish County was not immune from suit based on alleged failure to uphold duties under the DVA

## Opinion text

Andersen, J.
(concurring in the result) — This case has proceeded no further than the pleading stage. Upon reviewing the record before us, it cannot fairly be said that there is "no genuine issue as to any material fact" as required before a summary judgment may be entered. See CR 56(c). Accordingly, the trial court did not err in denying the motions for summary judgment here in question.
Guy, J., concurs with Andersen, J.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9538583. Public record. Not legal advice.