# Kiser v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · November 22, 1989 · 782 P.2d 405

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9538000

## Case

- **Full name:** Daniel C. KISER, Appellant, v. the STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** November 22, 1989
- **Citations:** 782 P.2d 405; 1989 WL 132371
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Parks
- **Judges:** Lane, Brett, Parks, Lumpkin, Johnson
- **Cited by:** 17 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9538000

## Opinion text

PARKS, Presiding Justice,
specially concurring:
I write separately to address appellant’s fourth proposition of error wherein he claims that the trial judge abused his discretion by refusing to grant a change of venue. Unlike Hale v. State, 750 P.2d 130 (Okl.Cr.1988), I cannot conclude that appellant has overcome the presumption of a fair and impartial trial due to the fact that he waived four of his peremptory challenges at trial. (Tr. 392, 491, 492). Therefore, I concur in the majority’s decision to affirm the judgment and sentence herein.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9538000. Public record. Not legal advice.