# Clackamas Town Center Associates v. Wolf

> Oregon Supreme Court · March 23, 1993 · 315 Or. 557

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9535971

## Case

- **Full name:** CLACKAMAS TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES, and Hahn Property Management Corporation, a Corporation, Respondents on Review, v. Donna WOLF, Lloyd Marbet, Forelaws on Board/Don’t Waste Oregon, and John Does 1 to 100, Petitioners on Review
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 23, 1993
- **Citations:** 315 Or. 557; 849 P.2d 477; 1993 Ore. LEXIS 35
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Gillette
- **Judges:** Carson, Peterson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis, Tongue
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9535971

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- describing Clackamas Town Center as “a large shopping center similar to the Lloyd Center”

## Opinion text

GILLETTE, J.,
dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Lloyd Corporation v. Whiffen, 315 Or 500, 528-56 , 849 P2d 446 (1993).
I wish to note also that the majority opinion in this case provides no standards to guide either the shopping mall or trial courts in shaping future “time, place, and manner” restrictions. The majority simply says “no” to two rules of the shopping mall. This is a brave new world that the majority is carving out. The least it could do is provide a map.
Carson, C. J., and Peterson, J., join in this dissenting opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9535971. Public record. Not legal advice.