# Myers v. Luttrell

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · October 17, 1961 · 373 P.2d 22

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9532772

## Case

- **Full name:** C. G. MYERS, Plaintiff in Error, v. S. B. LUTTRELL, Defendant in Error
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** October 17, 1961
- **Citations:** 373 P.2d 22; 1961 OK 248; 1961 Okla. LEXIS 508
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Welch
- **Judges:** Blackbird, Davison, Halley, Johnson, Jackson, Irwin, Berry, Williams, Welch
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9532772

## Opinion text

WELCH, Justice
(dissenting).
I cannot escape the conclusion that there were questions of fact to be decided, and the force thereof to be evaluated and applied, by the jury.
The case was presented to the jury on adequate instructions which fairly submitted the contentions of both parties, nothing to the contrary is shown or stated on that point. The jury returned their verdict and it was approved by the trial court.
Upon our review and on applicable law, and upon the purported facts as presented by the evidence, I think the judgment, based on the verdict, should be affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9532772. Public record. Not legal advice.