# Fraenkel v. Trescony

> California Supreme Court · April 19, 1957 · 48 Cal. 2d 378

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9532454

## Case

- **Full name:** CARL M. FRAENKEL, Appellant, v. J. G. TRESCONY, Respondent
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 19, 1957
- **Citations:** 48 Cal. 2d 378; 309 P.2d 819; 1957 Cal. LEXIS 191
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Carter
- **Judges:** Spence, Schauer, Carter
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9532454

## Opinion text

CARTER, J.
I dissent.
I concur in the views expressed in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Schauer and for the reasons there stated and also for the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in Fraenkel v. Bank of America, 40 Cal.2d 845 at page 851 [ 256 P.2d 569 ], I would reverse the judgment.
Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied May 15, 1957. Shenk, J., Carter, J., and Schauer, J., were of the opinion that the petition should be granted.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9532454. Public record. Not legal advice.