# Worchester v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · June 4, 1975 · 536 P.2d 995

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9531309

## Case

- **Full name:** Nicholas Franklin WORCHESTER, Appellant, v. the STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** June 4, 1975
- **Citations:** 536 P.2d 995; 1975 OK CR 111
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Brett
- **Judges:** Bliss, Bussey, Brett
- **Cited by:** 13 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9531309

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- finding a "technical violation" of section 894 by written communication was harmless error

## Opinion text

BRETT, Presiding Judge
(concurring in part and dissenting in part) •:
I concur that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction, but I dissent to the use of the sixteen year old convictions to enhance punishment. Therefore, I would modify the sentence imposed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9531309. Public record. Not legal advice.