# Brown v. Anderson Board of Public Safety

> Indiana Court of Appeals · October 23, 2002 · 777 N.E.2d 1106

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9531113

## Case

- **Full name:** Edward BROWN, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. the ANDERSON BOARD OF PUBLIC SAFETY and David Eicks, Anderson Building Commissioner, Appellees-Defendants
- **Court:** Indiana Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** October 23, 2002
- **Citations:** 777 N.E.2d 1106; 2002 WL 31418540
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Baker
- **Judges:** Barnes, Baker, Vaidik
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9531113

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- affirming judgment for city in demolition case; city presented testimony from 1 inspector that property owners failed to fix unsafe structure

## Opinion text

BAKER, J., and VAIDIK, J.,
concur.
ORDER
This Court having heretofore handed down its opinion in this appeal on September 30, 2002, marked Memorandum Decision, Not for Publication;
Come now the Appellees, by counsel, and file herein Motion to Publish Memorandum Decision, alleging therein that said decision should be published for the reason that said decision clarifies the law as it relates to unsafe buildings and the enforcement of building standards; that the statute pertaining to unsafe buildings, I.C. 36-7-9 et seq., has few appellate decisions which have interpreted and applied it; that publication will make members of the bar and the public aware that if an unsafe property is not repaired in a reasonable time period, the property will be demised as an unsafe structure.
The Court having examined said Motion, having reviewed its opinion in this appeal, and being duly advised, now finds that said Motion to Publish should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Appellees’ Motion to Publish Memorandum Decision is granted and this Court’s opinion heretofore handed down in this cause on September 30, 2002, as a Memorandum Decision, Not for Publication, is now ordered published.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9531113. Public record. Not legal advice.