# People v. Marquez

> California Supreme Court · January 23, 1992 · 1 Cal. 4th 553

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9530089

## Case

- **Full name:** The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GONZALO MARQUEZ MARQUEZ, Defendant and Appellant
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** January 23, 1992
- **Citations:** 1 Cal. 4th 553; 3 Cal. Rptr. 2d 710; 92 Daily Journal DAR 1183; 822 P.2d 418; 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 668; 1992 Cal. LEXIS 3
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Kennard
- **Judges:** Panelli
- **Cited by:** 84 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9530089

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- rejecting defendant’s due process claim that use of detective as interpreter during interrogation was improper because claim was “premised on authorities and standards relating to court interpreters at trial” that were inapplicable because detective was “functionfing] as a fac…

## Opinion text

*583 KENNARD, J., Dissenting.
Because I would grant defendant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and vacate the judgment of conviction (see In re Marquez, post, p. 584 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.2d 727 , 822 P.2d 435 ] [dis. opn. of Kennard, J.]), I would dismiss the appeal as moot.
Mosk, J., concurred.
Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied March 18, 1992. Mosk, J., and Kennard, J. were of the opinion that the petition should be granted.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9530089. Public record. Not legal advice.