# State v. Kroening

> Wisconsin Supreme Court · December 4, 1956 · 274 Wis. 266

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9520935

## Case

- **Full name:** State, Plaintiff, vs. Kroening, Defendant
- **Court:** Wisconsin Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 4, 1956
- **Citations:** 274 Wis. 266
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing by Cueiam
- **Judges:** Brown, Cueiam
- **Cited by:** 30 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9520935

## Opinion text

The following memorandum was filed February 5, 1957:
PER Cueiam
(on motion for rehearing). The trial court requested an answer to the Third question but the parties submitted no argument on the subject. The state now says that we should have refrained from answering it without the benefit of argument. The Second question being answered unfavorably to the state’s contentions, any answer to the Third
*276a question does not affect the disposition of the cause and under these circumstances we conclude it would have been preferable to omit answering the Third question. Accordingly, we withdraw what is said in the opinion concerning it. The state’s motion for rehearing is denied.
*0 H

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9520935. Public record. Not legal advice.