# The People v. Barba

> California Court of Appeal · April 19, 2013 · 215 Cal. App. 4th 712

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9520552

## Case

- **Full name:** The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTONIO BARBA, Defendant and Appellant
- **Court:** California Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** April 19, 2013
- **Citations:** 215 Cal. App. 4th 712; 155 Cal. Rptr. 3d 707; 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 309; 2013 WL 1694992
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Fleer
- **Judges:** Rubin
- **Cited by:** 38 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9520552

## Opinion text

*745 FLEER, J., Concurring.
I concur in the judgment because People v. Lopez (2012) 55 Cal.4th 569 [ 147 Cal.Rptr.3d 559 , 286 P.3d 469 ] and People v. Dungo (2012) 55 Cal.4th 608 [ 147 Cal.Rptr.3d 527 , 286 P.3d 442 ] require finding the admission of Dr. Reynolds’s testimony did not violate the confrontation clause.
Appellant’s petition for review by the Supreme Court was denied July 24, 2013, S210914. Werdegar, J., did not participate therein.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9520552. Public record. Not legal advice.