# McKinney v. State

> Indiana Supreme Court · March 26, 1998 · 693 N.E.2d 65

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9505717

## Case

- **Full name:** David McKINNEY, Et Al., Appellants-Defendants, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff
- **Court:** Indiana Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 26, 1998
- **Citations:** 693 N.E.2d 65; 1998 Ind. LEXIS 29; 1998 WL 136500
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Sullivan
- **Judges:** Boehm, Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Selby
- **Cited by:** 57 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9505717

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting the lack of an intent-to-defraud element in IDCSA claims based on uncured deceptive acts as opposed to incurable deceptive acts

## Opinion text

SULLIVAN, J.,
concurs in Parts I through IV of the opinion but dissents from Part V, believing the allegations were pled with sufficient particularity to meet the requirements of Indiana Trial Rule 9(B).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9505717. Public record. Not legal advice.