# Novick v. Myers

> Oregon Supreme Court · June 8, 2000 · 330 Or. 351

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9503461

## Case

- **Full name:** Steven NOVICK, Petitioner, v. Hardy MYERS, Attorney General for the State of Oregon, Respondent
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 8, 2000
- **Citations:** 330 Or. 351; 7 P.3d 518; 2000 Ore. LEXIS 393
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Van Hoomissen
- **Judges:** Carson, Van Hoomissen
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9503461

## Opinion text

VAN HOOMISSEN, J.,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. In my view, the Attorney General’s certified ballot title substantially complies with the requirements of ORS 250.035 (1997). ORS 250.085(5).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9503461. Public record. Not legal advice.