# Kane v. Principi

> United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 28, 2003 · 17 Vet. App. 97

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9502362

## Case

- **Full name:** Judith A. KANE, Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee
- **Court:** United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
- **Decided:** May 28, 2003
- **Citations:** 17 Vet. App. 97; 2003 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 385; 2003 WL 21222011
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Steinberg
- **Judges:** Farley, Ivers, Steinberg
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9502362

## Opinion text

*104 STEINBERG, Judge,
concurring:
I concur in the opinion of the Court except for part II.D. The Court is not called upon to address the VCAA here because “neither party ... has argued that application of the VCAA could be beneficial to the appellant.” Williams (Shirley) v. Principi, 15 Vet.App. 189, 199 (2001) (en banc) (Kramer, C.J., with whom Steinberg, J., joined, stating separately).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9502362. Public record. Not legal advice.