# Carpenter v. Principi

> United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · February 15, 2002 · 16 Vet. App. 102

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9502283

## Case

- **Full name:** Kenneth M. CARPENTER, Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee
- **Court:** United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
- **Decided:** February 15, 2002
- **Citations:** 16 Vet. App. 102; 2002 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 90; 2002 WL 233460
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Steinberg
- **Judges:** Kramer, Farley, Holdaway, Ivers, Steinberg, Greene
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9502283

## Opinion text

STEINBERG, Judge,
dissenting:
I voted to grant full Court reconsideration in this case, for the reasons stated in my dissent to the June 21, 2001, en banc opinion, Carpenter v. Principi, 15 Vet.App. 64, 79 (2001) (Steinberg, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), except for part II.C.l., regarding the Court’s jurisdiction in terms of the failure to discuss section 402 of the Veterans’ Judicial Review Act, Pub.L. No. 100-687, § 402 , 102 Stat. 4105 , 4122 (1988) [hereinafter VJRA § 402], which has been repealed by the Veterans Education and Benefits Expansion Act of 2001, Pub.L. No. 107-103, § 603 (a), 115 Stat. 976 , 999; see also id. at § 603(d) (making repeal of VJRA § 402 applicable to all pending and subsequent claims). I therefore respectfully dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9502283. Public record. Not legal advice.