# United States v. Algimantas Dailide,defendant-Appellant

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · September 5, 2000 · 227 F.3d 385

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9493449

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Algimantas DAILIDE, Defendant-Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 5, 2000
- **Citations:** 227 F.3d 385; 55 Fed. R. Serv. 740; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22436; 2000 WL 1264639
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Nelson
- **Judges:** Nelson, Boggs, Clay
- **Cited by:** 19 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9493449

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating, in the context of an action to revoke citizenship, that while the government’s evidence justifying revocation of citizenship must be “clear, unequivocal, and convincing,” “the defendant bears a ... heavy burden in establishing that he strictly complied with all the co…

## Opinion text

*399 DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge,
concurring in part.
I concur in the affirmance of summary judgment for the United States and in most of the reasoning, if not all of the rhetorical flourishes, ably set forth in Part IV of Judge Clay’s opinion. There is no genuine issue over the fact that Dailide assisted in the detention of Izrael and Riva oak, Jews who had escaped from the ghetto and who were turned over to the Germans for imprisonment. In helping to deprive these individuals of their freedom— which he unquestionably did, whether he personally was carrying a sidearm at the time or not — I believe that Dailide “assisted the enemy in persecuting civil populations of countries, Members of the United Nations,” within the meaning of those words as used in § 2(b) of the Displaced Persons Act of 1948. I express no view on the question whether summary judgment in favor of the government could also be affirmed on the basis of the misrepresentations Dailide made to the U.S. Army’s Counter Intelligence Corps about his wartime activities.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9493449. Public record. Not legal advice.