# Robert Franklin v. District of Columbia

> Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · March 22, 1999 · 168 F.3d 1360

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9491913

## Case

- **Full name:** Robert FRANKLIN, Et Al., Appellees, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- **Decided:** March 22, 1999
- **Citations:** 168 F.3d 1360; 335 U.S. App. D.C. 60; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8333; 1999 WL 167538
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Edwards, Wald, Silberman, Williams, Ginsburg, Sentelle, Henderson, Randolph, Rogers, Tatel, Garland
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9491913

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellees’ Petition For Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.
Circuit Judges WALD and TATEL would grant the suggestion. Their statement is attached.
Separate statement filed by WALD and TATEL, Circuit Judges, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9491913. Public record. Not legal advice.