# Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod v. Federal Communications Commission, Missouri State Conference of Branches of the Naacp, Intervenors

> Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · September 15, 1998 · 154 F.3d 494

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9491445

## Case

- **Full name:** LUTHERAN CHURCH-MISSOURI SYNOD, Appellant, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee, Missouri State Conference of Branches of the NAACP, Et Al., Intervenors
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- **Decided:** September 15, 1998
- **Citations:** 154 F.3d 494; 332 U.S. App. D.C. 172; 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,483; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 22596
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Edwards, Wald, Silberman, Williams, Ginsburg, Sentelle, Randolph, Rogers, Tatel, Garland
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9491445

## Opinion text

A statement by Chief Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS, with whom WALD, Circuit Judge, concurs, dissenting from the denial of the suggestions of rehearing en bane is attached.
A statement filed by Circuit Judge TATEL, with whom WALD, Circuit Judge, concurs, dissenting from the denial of the suggestions of rehearing en banc is also attached.
*495 Circuit Judge ROGERS would grant the suggestions of rehearing en banc.
Circuit Judge GARLAND did not participate in this matter.
ON SUGGESTIONS OF REHEARING EN BANC
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Respondent’s and Intervenor’s Suggestions of Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestions. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
Ordered that the suggestions be denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9491445. Public record. Not legal advice.