# Sandra D. Riley v. Larue T. Camp, Lori Winkler, F.K.A. Lori Webb

> Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · December 8, 1997 · 130 F.3d 958

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9490803

## Case

- **Full name:** Sandra D. RILEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larue T. CAMP, Lori Winkler, F.K.A. Lori Webb, Defendants-Appellants
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- **Decided:** December 8, 1997
- **Citations:** 130 F.3d 958; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 34309; 1997 WL 753761
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Kravitch, Hatchett, Tjoflat, Anderson, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina, Black, Carnes, Barkett
- **Cited by:** 46 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9490803

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining the Eleventh Circuit's position that "the Rochin standard has no place in a civil case for money damages," McKinney v. Pate, 20 F.3d 1550, 1556 n. 7 (11th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110, 115 S.Ct. 898, 130 L.Ed.2d 783 (1995)
- noting that, regarding the plaintiffs substantive due process claim, “[t]he Fifth Amendment obviously does not apply ... -the acts complained of were committed by state rather than federal officials”
- noting that “[t]he Fifth Amendment obviously does not apply .. . — the acts complained of were committed by state rather than federal officials”
- affirming award of punitive damages in deliberate indifference case

## Opinion text

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion April 26, 1996, 11th Cir., Unpublished).
Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9490803. Public record. Not legal advice.