# Jack W. Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · December 21, 1995 · 72 F.3d 1386

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9488789

## Case

- **Full name:** Jack W. FRIEND, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ronald KOLODZIECZAK, Et Al., Defendants-Appellants
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 21, 1995
- **Citations:** 72 F.3d 1386
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Pregerson, Ferguson, O'Scannlain
- **Cited by:** 45 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9488789

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that interest is calculated from the date of judgment unconditionally entitling the prevailing party to attorney fees
- observing that post-judgment interest applies to 22 1 awards of costs and runs from the date that entitlement was secured, rather than from the 2 date that the exact quantity was set
- observing that 7 post-judgment interest applies to awards of costs and runs from the date that entitlement 8 was secured, rather than from the date that the exact quantity was set
- affirming district court's holding that "[i]nterest runs from the date that entitlement to fees is secured, rather than from the date that the exact quantity of fees is set"

## Opinion text

AMENDED ORDER, DISSENT, AND DENIAL OF REHEARING
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Before: PREGERSON, FERGUSON, and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9488789. Public record. Not legal advice.