# William C. Davidson v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for United Bank of Texas, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · February 22, 1995 · 44 F.3d 246

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9487663

## Case

- **Full name:** William C. DAVIDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION as Receiver for United Bank of Texas, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 22, 1995
- **Citations:** 44 F.3d 246; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 3467
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Garwood, Garza, Head
- **Cited by:** 28 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9487663

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that the objective of “reducing] the monetary ex *1029 posure of the federal deposit insurance fund” is insufficient to preempt Texas foreclosure laws
- holding that even the objective of “reduc[ing] the monetary exposure of the federal deposit insurance fund” is insufficient to preempt Texas foreclosure laws
- finding that FDIC could not prevail on the ground that there was a federal interest in “simply not depleting the deposit insurance fund”
- holding that transfer of note in default to FDIC triggered six-year statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C. § 2415(a)

## Opinion text

*256
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Feb. 22, 1995
(Opinion 5th Cir., 1995, 44 F.3d 246 )
Before GARWOOD and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges, and HEAD, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above ease is DENIED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9487663. Public record. Not legal advice.