# United States v. Mark Young

> Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · September 2, 1994 · 34 F.3d 500

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9487283

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
- **Decided:** September 2, 1994
- **Citations:** 34 F.3d 500; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24097; 1994 WL 476601
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Crabb
- **Judges:** Cummings, Ripple, Crabb
- **Cited by:** 26 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9487283

## Opinion text

*509 CRABB, Chief District Judge,
concurring.
I agree with Judge Ripple’s resolution of Mark Young’s challenge to the application of the Sentencing Guidelines. I write separately to state my belief that, whether or not a defendant knows the production ratio of marijuana plants, the marijuana equivalency tables should not be used to quadruple count, as they were here.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9487283. Public record. Not legal advice.