# United States v. Norman Meyers

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · January 2, 1992 · 952 F.2d 914

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9482428

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norman MEYERS, Defendant-Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 2, 1992
- **Citations:** 952 F.2d 914; 34 Fed. R. Serv. 1413; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24; 1992 WL 55
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Jones
- **Judges:** Martin, Jones, Lively
- **Cited by:** 76 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9482428

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- applying the Williams factors in a 609(a) case

## Opinion text

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge,
concurring.
I concur in the portion of the majority opinion that discusses the failure to file an information under 21 U.S.C. § 851 (1988) and in the remainder of the opinion. I write separately only to note that the majority properly interprets United States v. Williams, 899 F.2d 1526 (6th Cir.1990) as a case of statutory sentencing rather than guideline sentencing. Accordingly, Williams does not stand for the proposition that an information is required in cases of guideline sentencing and, thus, the following cases are incorrect in construing Williams as contrary to their holdings: United States v. Novey, 922 F.2d 624, 627 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991); United States v. Marshall, 910 F.2d 1241, 1245 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 976 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1061 (1991); Hansen v. United States Parole Comm’n, 904 F.2d 306, 309 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 765 , 112 L.Ed.2d 784 (1991).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9482428. Public record. Not legal advice.