# Peter Schiff v. United States

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · October 1, 1991 · 942 F.2d 348

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9481982

## Case

- **Full name:** Peter SCHIFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 1, 1991
- **Citations:** 942 F.2d 348; 1991 WL 153124
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Krupansky
- **Judges:** Krupansky, Boggs, Cohn
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9481982

## Opinion text

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent in the disposition of the panel majority for the reasons articulated in the well-reasoned opinion of the Seventh Circuit in McNamara v. Commissioner, 827 F.2d 168 (7th Cir.1987).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9481982. Public record. Not legal advice.