# Armco, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Intervenor

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · March 15, 1989 · 869 F.2d 975

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9478805

## Case

- **Full name:** ARMCO, INC., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Intervenor
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 15, 1989
- **Citations:** 869 F.2d 975; 19 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20769; 29 ERC (BNA) 1250; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2968; 1989 WL 21530
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Engel
- **Judges:** Engel, Wellford, Thomas
- **Cited by:** 11 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9478805

## Opinion text

ENGEL, Chief Judge,
concurring.
I fully concur in section I of Judge Well-ford’s excellent opinion concluding that we are without jurisdiction to hear this petition for review. Having held as much, I refrain from joining in the remainder of the opinion, not because of disagreement with its content but because, having concluded that we have no jurisdiction over the controversy at this stage, I am uncomfortable in joining in comments which, while they may be well borne out ultimately by later developments, are essentially dicta at this point as the majority opinion acknowledges.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9478805. Public record. Not legal advice.