# Jewellean S. Mangaroo v. Ivory v. Nelson

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · February 8, 1989 · 864 F.2d 1202

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9478558

## Case

- **Full name:** Jewellean S. MANGAROO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ivory v. NELSON, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 8, 1989
- **Citations:** 864 F.2d 1202; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2167; 1989 WL 3535
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Politz, King, Smith
- **Cited by:** 51 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9478558

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that we may affirm on any basis supported by the record
- stating that the court may affirm for any grounds in the record, "even if those grounds were rejected by the trial court”
- noting qualified immunity does not apply to official-capacity claims

## Opinion text

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM:
The plaintiff has filed a petition for rehearing solely to seek a clarification on the issue of attorneys’ fees on appeal. We grant rehearing to explain that our determination that each party shall bear its own costs is without prejudice to plaintiffs application, on remand, for attorneys’ fees for this appeal, as to which fees we intimate no opinion. In all other respects, rehearing is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9478558. Public record. Not legal advice.