# Maria Corado Rodriguez, and Juan Carlos Corado Moreno v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · March 14, 1988 · 841 F.2d 865

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9477334

## Case

- **Full name:** Maria Corado RODRIGUEZ, and Juan Carlos Corado Moreno, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 14, 1988
- **Citations:** 841 F.2d 865
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Anderson
- **Judges:** Anderson, Pregerson, Reinhardt
- **Cited by:** 120 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9477334

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- finding prima facie case of eligibility for both asylum and withholding of deportation notwithstanding petitioner's return to El Salvador to get her child and an ensuing six-month stay to raise enough money to return to the United States
- finding a well-founded fear of future persecution where six of the petitioner’s family members were killed by “the Salvadoran guerrillas in retaliation against her family’s association with the government-supported rural militia”
- stating that motion to reopen filed while an appeal is pending before the BIA is treated as a motion to remand to the IJ for further proceedings
- holding that acts of violence against petitioner's immediate family members relevant to determining whether petitioner's fear was well founded
- explaining that the requirements of a motion to reopen and a “redesignat[ed]” motion to remand “are for all practical purposes the same”

## Opinion text

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge,
concurring:
I withdraw my partial dissent to the majority opinion. I concur in the result now reached in Judge Reinhardt’s revised opinion. Roque-Carranza v. INS, 778 F.2d 1373 (9th Cir.1985).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9477334. Public record. Not legal advice.