# United States v. James Camarata

> Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · September 30, 1987 · 828 F.2d 974

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9476706

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America v. James CAMARATA, Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- **Decided:** September 30, 1987
- **Citations:** 828 F.2d 974
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Sloviter, Becker, Garth, Gibbons, Seitz, Weis, Higginbotham, Stapleton, Mansmann, Greenberg, Scirica
- **Cited by:** 21 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9476706

## Opinion text

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant, James Camarata in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied. Judge Mansmann would have granted rehearing. Judge Garth as a Senior Circuit Judge is remitted to voting only for panel rehearing. See 28 U.S.C. § 46 ; Internal Operating Procedures, Third Circuit, Chapter 9B.3. Accordingly, Judge Garth would grant the petition for panel rehearing for the reasons set forth in his panel dissents in United States v. Davis, 828 F.2d 968 (3d Cir.1987) and United States v. Camarata, 828 F.2d 974 (3d Cir.1987).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9476706. Public record. Not legal advice.