# Envirotech Corporation v. Al George, Incorporated and Monosep, Inc.

> Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · March 19, 1984 · 730 F.2d 753

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9471976

## Case

- **Full name:** ENVIROTECH CORPORATION, Appellant, v. AL GEORGE, INCORPORATED and Monosep, Inc., Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- **Decided:** March 19, 1984
- **Citations:** 730 F.2d 753; 221 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 473; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 14872
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Baldwin
- **Judges:** Davis, Baldwin, Kashiwa
- **Cited by:** 234 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9471976

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that claim construction is a matter of law while reading the claims on the accused devices is a finding of fact

## Opinion text

BALDWIN, Circuit Judge,
specially concurring.
I only wish to clarify that in this case the claims at issue were submitted to the jury with proper instructions. The jury in its deliberations construed the claims in accordance with those instructions and then determined there was no infringement.
Further, regarding the ‘210 patent, we have not construed claim 1 de novo in this appeal. We are presuming this particular construction as it is consistent with the jury verdict and it is supported by substantial evidence.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9471976. Public record. Not legal advice.