# Connie S. ADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROWN & ROOT, INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · October 7, 1982 · 688 F.2d 410

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9469711

## Case

- **Full name:** 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1023, 12 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 510 Connie S. Adams v. Brown & Root, Inc.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 7, 1982
- **Citations:** 688 F.2d 410; 1983 A.M.C. 2400; 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24975
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Gee, Randall, Tate
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9469711

## Opinion text

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before GEE, RANDALL and TATE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
On rehearing, the panel is no longer unanimous in the conclusion of our earlier opinion, reported at 688 F.2d 410 , that error, if any, was harmless. We remain, however, unanimous in the view that no objection was made to the admission of the evidence complained of on appeal and that plain error is not presented.
Unanimity being required for dispositions on the summary calendar, we withdraw all references to harmless error contained in the opinion, leaving our affirmance to rest on the other, sufficient ground. In all other respects, the rehearing is
DENIED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9469711. Public record. Not legal advice.