# United States v. Joseph C. Frady

> Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · October 22, 1980 · 636 F.2d 506

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9467350

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Joseph C. FRADY, Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- **Decided:** October 22, 1980
- **Citations:** 636 F.2d 506; 204 U.S. App. D.C. 234; 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 12972
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Claims, Edwards, Friedman, MacKINNON, McGOWAN, Mikva, Per Curiam, Robb, Robinson, Tamm, Wald, Wilkey, Wright
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Red flag:** Reversed by United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152 (1982).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9467350

## Opinion text

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.
Before WRIGHT, Chief Judge, McGOWAN, TAMM, ROBINSON, MacKINNON, ROBB, WILKEY, WALD, MIKVA, EDWARDS and GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The suggestion for rehearing en bane, filed by appellee having been transmitted to the full Court and a majority of the judges in regular active service not having voted in favor thereof, it is
ORDERED, by the Court, en banc, that appellee’s aforesaid suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9467350. Public record. Not legal advice.