# National Labor Relations Board v. Haberman Construction Company

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · July 15, 1980 · 618 F.2d 288

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9466613

## Case

- **Full name:** NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. HABERMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 15, 1980
- **Citations:** 618 F.2d 288; 105 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2059; 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 15712
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Tuttle, Goldberg, Randall
- **Cited by:** 28 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Yellow flag:** Modified in part by National Labor Relations Board v. Haberman Construction Company, 641 F.2d 351 (1981).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9466613

## Opinion text

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before COLEMAN, Chief Judge, BROWN, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJO-FLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POL-ITZ,- HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, THOMAS A. CLARK and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9466613. Public record. Not legal advice.