# The B. F. Goodrich Company v. Department of Transportation, Uniroyal, Inc. v. Department of Transportation

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · October 8, 1976 · 541 F.2d 1178

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9463089

## Case

- **Full name:** The B. F. GOODRICH COMPANY Et Al., Petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Et Al., Respondents; UNIROYAL, INC., Et Al., Petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Et Al., Respondents
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 8, 1976
- **Citations:** 541 F.2d 1178
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Engel
- **Judges:** Engel, Edwards, Lively, En-Gel
- **Cited by:** 11 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9463089

## Opinion text

ENGEL, Circuit Judge
(concurring).
I refrain from joining those portions of the opinion touching on the delay in promulgation of the rule, not from any particular disagreement with them, but from uncertainty where blame ought finally to rest, if anywhere. So much is clear from the record: the issue has been complex and difficult for the Congress, for the agency, for the industry, and finally, for us. In all other respects, however, I fully concur in Judge Edwards’ well-reasoned opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9463089. Public record. Not legal advice.