# United States v. Lyle B. Snider, United States of America v. Lyle B. Snider, and Sue T. Snider

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 19, 1974 · 502 F.2d 645

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9461002

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Lyle B. SNIDER, Appellant; UNITED STATES of Africa, Appellee, Lyle B. SNIDER, and Sue T. Snider, Appellants
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 19, 1974
- **Citations:** 502 F.2d 645; 27 A.L.R. Fed. 885; 34 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5601; 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7534
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Field
- **Judges:** Craven, Field, Widener, Winter
- **Cited by:** 66 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9461002

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that the defendants' failure to rise from their seats and stand, "accompanied only by such interruption of proceedings as are thought necessary by the district judge to explain the consequences of contempt and cite the alleged contemnor for his actions," was not "misbe…
- noting in analyzing the terms “false” and “fraudulent” in 26 U.S.C. § 7205 in relation to other federal criminal statutory schemes that the rule against surplusage is satisfied where context shows “it is not unlikely” that the legislature’s use of similar terms in a criminal s…

## Opinion text

FIELD, Circuit Judge
(dissenting):
I am in wholehearted agreement with the views expressed by Judge Widener in his able and well reasoned dissenting opinion. Despite the disclaimer of the majority, it occurs to me that its approach to this case would, in effect, “reduce the withholding system ‘to a shambles’.” Today it is a Quaker with firm convictions about the Vietnam conflict who disregards the tax laws of the Nation to dramatize his position. Tomorrow it may be one who elects to follow such a course for any one of a variety of ideological or political beliefs. As stated by Judge Aldisert in United States v. Malinowski, 472 F.2d 850, 857 (3 Cir. 1973), which the majority is at some pains to distinguish or, in the alternative, declines to follow, Snider “wants the best of both worlds; to disobey, yet to be absolved of punishment for disobedience.” Unfortunately, the majority grants him just such a Utopian choice.
With respect to the reversal of the contempt charges, I can add little to the observations of Judge Widener except to say that this is merely one more regrettable step which undercuts the authority of the already beleaguered district judges who are charged with the orderly administration of justice in the trial arena and, unlike us, do not live in the sterile and sometimes unrealistic environment of the appellate ivory tower.
I would grant rehearing and rectify this unfortunate decision.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9461002. Public record. Not legal advice.