# Named Individual Members of the San Antonio Conservation Society v. The Texas Highway Department

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · August 29, 1974 · 496 F.2d 1017

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9460608

## Case

- **Full name:** NAMED INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF the SAN ANTONIO CONSERVATION SOCIETY Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the TEXAS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 29, 1974
- **Citations:** 496 F.2d 1017; 4 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20643; 6 ERC (BNA) 1881; 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7037
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Tuttle, Coleman, Ainsworth
- **Cited by:** 31 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9460608

## Opinion text

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION OF REHEARING EN BANC
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll limited to the question of the allowance of attorney’s fees requested in this case, and a majority of the Judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc solely on this issue, IT IS ORDERED that this issue of the request for attorney’s fees shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.
No member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc on the remaining issues [Rule 35 F.R.A.P.; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12], the petition for rehearing and suggestion of rehearing en banc in all other respects is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9460608. Public record. Not legal advice.