# Albert C. Toney v. N. A. White, United States of America v. Myrtis Bishop

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · June 1, 1973 · 476 F.2d 203

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9459331

## Case

- **Full name:** Albert C. TONEY Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. N. A. WHITE Et Al., Defendants-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Myrtis BISHOP Et Al., Defendants-Appellants
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 1, 1973
- **Citations:** 476 F.2d 203
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Aldrich, Simpson, Clark
- **Cited by:** 29 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Yellow flag:** Modified by Albert C. Toney v. N. A. White, United States of America v. Myrtis Bishop, 488 F.2d 310 (1973).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9459331

## Opinion text

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, IN-GRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
It is ordered that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9459331. Public record. Not legal advice.