# National Labor Relations Board v. Supak and Sons Manufacturing Corporation

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 11, 1973 · 470 F.2d 998

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9458979

## Case

- **Full name:** NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SUPAK AND SONS MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 11, 1973
- **Citations:** 470 F.2d 998; 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2560; 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 12210
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Bryan, Butzner, Per Curiam, Russell
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9458979

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
The National Labor Relations Board petitioned for enforcement of its order *999 against Supak and Sons Manufacturing Corporation in which the Board found that the company violated § 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act [ 29 U.S.C. § 158 (a)(5) and (1)]. The issues and facts were exhaustively stated by the trial examiner, whose findings, conclusions, and recommendations were adopted by a panel of the Board, one member dissenting. Supak & Sons, 192 N.L.R.B. No. 181, 78 LRRM 1289 (1971). Although there are conflicts in the testimony, we are satisfied, upon consideration of the record, briefs, and oral argument, that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the Board’s findings and that its rulings are not erroneous. Accordingly, we enforce the Board’s order.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9458979. Public record. Not legal advice.