# National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 640, and Its Agent, Glynn Ross

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · July 18, 1972 · 464 F.2d 545

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9458511

## Case

- **Full name:** NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 640, and Its Agent, Glynn Ross, Respondents
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 18, 1972
- **Citations:** 464 F.2d 545; 80 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3242; 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8363
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Pregerson
- **Judges:** Pregerson, Chambers, Wright
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9458511

## Opinion text

PREGERSON, District Judge
(dissenting) :
I respectfully dissent.
Reviewing the record as a whole, I cannot conscientiously say that the Board’s findings of violations by the union are supported by substantial evidence. Like gruel, that evidence is thin and insubstantial. Its main ingredients are suspicion and surmise. Accordingly, I would deny the Board’s petition for enforcement. See Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9458511. Public record. Not legal advice.