# United States v. Stephen Michael Brudney, Plaintiff-Defendant-Appellant

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · October 16, 1972 · 463 F.2d 376

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9458430

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen Michael BRUDNEY, Plaintiff-Defendant-Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 16, 1972
- **Citations:** 463 F.2d 376
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Chambers
- **Judges:** Chambers, Wright, Lucas
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9458430

## Opinion text

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge
(dissenting):
I am convinced that the order of call claim is good. The Selective Service regulations [ 32 CFR §§ 1606.31 et seq.] provide a comprehensive scheme of rules governing the production of Selective Service files in court and the use of such files by United States attorneys and other government agents. None of these regulations allows the removal of original files to the United States attorney’s office as was done here. There has been no attempt by the government to show compliance with these regulations. Brudney’s conviction should be reversed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9458430. Public record. Not legal advice.