# Turner's Express, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 14, 1972 · 456 F.2d 289

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9457887

## Case

- **Full name:** TURNER’S EXPRESS, INCORPORATED, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 14, 1972
- **Citations:** 456 F.2d 289; 79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2796; 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10760
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Craven
- **Judges:** Craven, Russell, Chapman
- **Cited by:** 28 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9457887

## Opinion text

CRAVEN, Circuit Judge
(dissenting) :
I would accept as supported by substantial evidence the appraisal of the Board that the election environment was fair and uncoerced and would enforce the Board’s order. If anyone were fearful of reprisal in this small company of some 53 employees, I should think it would have been the pro-union supervisors rather than the anti-union employees. As I suggested in my dissenting statement in N. L. R. B. v. Heck’s Inc., 386 F.2d 317, 323 (4th Cir. 1967), it strains reality to suppose anti-union employees may have to submit to tyranny by “disloyal” supervisors — unable to catch the ear of a sympathetic and grateful management.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9457887. Public record. Not legal advice.