# John J. Goodrich v. Arnold C. Harmsen and Burke P. Lokey, Burke P. Lokey v. Arnold C. Harmsen and John J. Goodrich

> Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 25, 1971 · 442 F.2d 377

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9456868

## Case

- **Full name:** John J. GOODRICH, Appellant, v. Arnold C. HARMSEN and Burke P. Lokey, Appellees; Burke P. LOKEY, Appellant, v. Arnold C. HARMSEN and John J. Goodrich, Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
- **Decided:** May 25, 1971
- **Citations:** 442 F.2d 377; 58 C.C.P.A. 1144
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Baldwin
- **Judges:** Baldwin, Rich, Almond, Lane
- **Cited by:** 20 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9456868

## Opinion text

BALDWIN, Judge
(concurring).
It is my belief that the party Harmsen could not prevail in this case even were his evidence convincing beyond a shadow of a doubt. The law as announced by this court in Brokaw v. Vogel, 429 F.2d 476 , 57 CCPA 1296 (1970) is controlling. For this reason I do not join the majority’s disparagement of Harmsen’s evidence. I agree with the rest of the opinion and therefore concur in result.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9456868. Public record. Not legal advice.