# Don H. McGuire v. Emmett Julius Davis

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · March 1, 1971 · 437 F.2d 570

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9456459

## Case

- **Full name:** Don H. McGUIRE Et Al. Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Emmett Julius DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 1, 1971
- **Citations:** 437 F.2d 570
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Bell, Thornberry, Clark
- **Cited by:** 17 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9456459

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- recognizing "the well-settled proposition that a physician who has examined an injured party may describe what he has seen and give his expert inferences therefrom”
- finding objection to doctor’s testimony as to causation without merit because “a physician who has examined an injured party may describe what he has seen and give his expert inferences therefrom”
- finding objections to a treating physician’s testimony as to causation without merit because “a physician who has examined an injured party may describe what he has seen and give his expert inferences therefrom”

## Opinion text

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en bane, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Bane is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9456459. Public record. Not legal advice.