# Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. United States

> United States Court of Claims · March 20, 1970 · 423 F.2d 300

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9455392

## Case

- **Full name:** Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. United States
- **Court:** United States Court of Claims
- **Decided:** March 20, 1970
- **Citations:** 423 F.2d 300; 191 Ct. Cl. 141; 1970 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 20
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Davis
- **Judges:** Cowen, Laramore, Durfee, Davis, Collins, Skelton, Nichols
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9455392

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that the regulation need not be in effect when the contract was awarded so long as adoption of the regulation was remedial and intended to afford safeguards to the contractor

## Opinion text

DAVIS, Judge
(concurring):
Newport News, which I consider now binding on me, settled the issue of whether the ASPR guidelines were required to be followed even though neither party invoked them before the Board. That being so, I agree with the court, for the reasons it gives, that those regulations apply to this case as well, and on that basis I join in the disposition requiring them to be applied here.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9455392. Public record. Not legal advice.