# Charles A. Darden v. United States

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · January 6, 1969 · 405 F.2d 1054

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9454189

## Case

- **Full name:** Charles A. DARDEN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 6, 1969
- **Citations:** 405 F.2d 1054; 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9457
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Ely
- **Judges:** Duniway, Ely, Byrne
- **Cited by:** 35 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9454189

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that “a conviction in federal court may be based on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice”
- noting that a plea 28 bargain “affects only the weight of the testimony, not its admissibility”

## Opinion text

ELY, Circuit Judge
(concurring) :
I agree that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. The accusing testimony of the accomplice was amply corroborated by other evidence.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9454189. Public record. Not legal advice.